http://w.thebigwave.net/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Change_5161 2026-04-15T09:08:25Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.29.2 http://w.thebigwave.net/wiki/index.php?title=Change_5161&diff=14114&oldid=prev 2020-01-25T19:47:00Z

<p>Created page with &quot;Originally Posted : Mon Nov 12 23:22:53 2012&lt;br&gt;Posted by : Misery&lt;br&gt;Title : misc. changes&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To avoid sending anyone&#039;s conspiracy detectors whirling, I have been &lt;br&gt;sta...&quot;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Originally Posted : Mon Nov 12 23:22:53 2012&lt;br&gt;Posted by : Misery&lt;br&gt;Title : misc. changes&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To avoid sending anyone's conspiracy detectors whirling, I have been &lt;br&gt;standardizing how some common tasks on equipment are handled (think weapon &lt;br&gt;hit bonuses, skill boosts, stat boosts and resistance boosts), and now &lt;br&gt;that the code is in place I am converting many existing items. It's &lt;br&gt;possible this will result in some small behavioral differences, but for &lt;br&gt;the most part things should continue as-is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This involves editing something on the order of hundreds of items, and as &lt;br&gt;such I will most likely ignore any questions about whether I've changed a &lt;br&gt;given item unless accompanied by a statemet about how it behaved &lt;br&gt;previously and how it is currently behaving. I want you to feel free to &lt;br&gt;come to me if an item is misbehaving, but I also want to be clear that &lt;br&gt;this is already a very time-intensive process and I won't be particularly &lt;br&gt;pleased with anyone trying to get me to waste time chasing vague &lt;br&gt;suspicions that a weapon is ever so slightly different than it used to be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These are not the *primary* reasons for this post, however. The primary &lt;br&gt;reason is that using the proper channels to handle many forms of bonus &lt;br&gt;will result (in some cases immediately, and in other cases down the road) &lt;br&gt;in some equipment having more ego than it has had in the past. This is due &lt;br&gt;to the bonuses being properly registered and accounted for. In the &lt;br&gt;long-term I consider ego (but not the removal thereof) and level-based EQ &lt;br&gt;restrictions to be open to debate at the system level, but it's going to &lt;br&gt;be impractical at the moment to consider the validity of each ite's ego.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apologies for the long post,&lt;br&gt;Misery&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[[Category:Changes_Board]]</div>

Krule